This is a test, a test to see if Doc Searls actually listens to the long tail, and to see how long it takes. Now, I'm not going to do anything other than post this message which mentions his name, the long tail, and a subject he's near and dear to... the A-list and Gatekeepers.
Note: Doc, see the bold text below if you read this.
Why? Well, I'm curious, more than anything else. Doc strikes me as a good guy, who happens to be towards the top of the "long tail" of blogging.
There's another reason for this post... to reply (without hyperlinking to it... yikes).. to his post of February 11th entitled "Offensive Post". See, Doc is in a bad spot. He's accused of being a gatekeeper, merely because he's an "A-lister"... which is a no-win proposition... but it's all the wrong question.
The blog-o-sphere, web 2.0, or whatever the heck you want to call this mess of cluetrain, blogging, RSS, Technorati, and all of it... is different than many other things because the tools make it equal opprotunity. (Don't whine about unequal results, that's a matter of working at it!) I'm writing this at 11:30 PM CST on February 11, 2006. I'm fairly certain that Doc Searls will see and read this posting, without hyperlinking to his site (which would kick off a trackback or referal log)... all because of the nature of feeds he reads.
Now, Doc's read and written to me in the past, but it's not a daily thing... so knowing my reputation might give it a bit of a boost.... but not much. (No delusions of grandure here)
It'll be interesting to see exactly how, and how long, it takes.
Why do I care? Why should you? Because, if Doc is typical of the way things are going, the A-list is going to matter less and less, just as the blogrolls are becoming old news. We'll keep some daily reads, but we'll be filtering on subjects instead of authority. This completely eliminates hierarchy and replaces it with taxonomy (or tags, or whatever you want to call it today).
Thanks for your time and attention.
Saturday, February 11, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2009
(47)
-
►
October
(10)
- VRMish download manager... 2nd mention
- The Terminatrix
- How do I extract Picasa's "Name Tags" for use on F...
- Revolution, fear, and what to do about it.
- Novel N1H1, a nice dream, and a world of hurt.
- VMware ESXi 4.0 first boot
- Refinement #1 - Download Agent
- A User provided dowload service standard?
- Swine Flu Paranoia
- My Heart is in the right place, with you Noran!
-
►
May
(14)
- more thoughts about Google Wave
- Google wave - Web 2.0 at last
- More on why Google sucks
- Why google sucks
- Why virus scanners are doomed to fail
- Intent
- Empowering IT
- Empowering Virginia
- Expressing limits - can't be done yet
- Tools - it's all about tools
- Tags - an oops
- The limits of power
- Small improvements in the right places
- Blogging forces some unique constraints upon the ...
-
►
October
(10)
-
▼
2006
(126)
-
▼
February
(34)
- Technorati musings - part 3
- Hyperwords and Collaboration
- Embedded Keywords
- HTML - The Embedded Cancer
- Discontent
- Clue train, redux
- "no-feedback" nonsense
- The need for editing
- Virtual Machines, the future of security
- Dave's been outdone!
- Homeless photos
- Dotster, SSL support needs work
- Home Grown Video
- Blogging Meta - revised
- The Blogging Meta
- Web 2.0 requires reputation
- A real security model, spotted in the wild!
- Technorati musings - part 2
- Technorati through the 8th Dimension
- Thinking about gatekeepers, spam, and metadata
- Feeding the long tail
- Gatekeeper? Bah humbug
- Testing 1 2 3 - Doc Searls are you there?
- Free lunch?
- State of Security - 2006
- Long term thinking
- Tags vs Truthiness?
- LinkTag
- Expressive Linking
- Authority should always be questioned
- Semantic Web, Where art thou?
- Google needs to cut off China
- AT&T tries Extortion on Web 2.0
- Random thoughts for the day
-
▼
February
(34)
1 comments:
Hey, Mike.
Like I just said here, I believe I saw this post yesterday afternoon, while I was between planes at LAX. Not sure. It was yesterday, in any case. I couldn't get on your blog, though. I just saw an excerpt in my aggregator.
But I got to it tonight. And I thank you for getting that -- to me, at least -- this is about opportunity. It's just flat wrong to paint the blogosphere, and the Web as well, as just another medium. It's not. It's a wide-open space. Sure, you get power curves. But you get more ways to undermine the ones that are there, or to create your own, than any other "place", or "medium" you can find.
IMHO, of course.
Thanks again!
Doc
Post a Comment