I watched the first 45 minutes of your interview with Joe Rogan, and I had to stop. In summary, here's why
- You're not responding to the things Joe says, it's supposed to be a conversation, not a speech.
- When he fact checks you, try to move on quickly, it's supposed to be a conversation.
- You're talking way too fast. when you throw a bunch of new ideas at someone, you have to give them time to breath.
- To borrow a phrase from electronics, it was an impedance mismatch.
You can win this nomination, going on Joe's show was a good idea, but it seems you didn't prepare for it properly. You needed to schedule the day for it... not a 2 hour time slot. As it is, you had probably 2,000,000 hours of people actually watching you... a lot of wasted opportunity if they came away with the same impression I had. It was literally worth a year of face to face campaigning if you had 90 minutes in front of a crowd of 3,500 people every day.
You have great ideas. You've done the math. You're the first candidate who explained WHY they are so focused on money. I want you to make it to the debates, even though I don't think they are anywhere near as important as they used to be.
You have great ideas. You've done the math. You're the first candidate who explained WHY they are so focused on money. I want you to make it to the debates, even though I don't think they are anywhere near as important as they used to be.
The internet culture has different expectations than the TV/News culture. It's a growing culture. It's very important to get it right here.
I hope you found this helpful and constructive. Good luck going forward.
I hope you found this helpful and constructive. Good luck going forward.
--Mike--
No comments:
Post a Comment